An Urgent Appeal from Concerned Scientists and Ethicists
Abstract
The advent of artificial womb technology is hailed as a beacon of progress, providing a reprieve from natural gestation. However, lurking behind the facade of progress is an ominous shadow. This research paper shines light on the profound dangers posed by the unchecked proliferation of artificial wombs — from the disturbing onset of a new era of human slavery and trafficking to the chilling specter of organ harvesting.
Introduction
Beyond the captivating promise of medical breakthroughs, the realm of artificial wombs is teeming with ethical quandaries. Rosamund Scott, a seasoned bioethicist, raises the alarm, cautioning that such technology stands at the precipice of commodifying human birth, potentially diminishing life’s inherent sanctity (Scott, 2020). We urgently implore all stakeholders, from researchers to policymakers, to deliberate deeply and act swiftly to preemptively address the myriad ethical concerns posed by this technological marvel.
The Terrifying Potential for Exploitation: A New Age of Slavery and Trafficking
Technological advancements, while promising, are not devoid of pitfalls. David Shaw, an astute legal scholar, paints a haunting picture where ownership of a child gestated externally becomes a battleground of disputes (Shaw, 2019). Absent rigorous regulations, the specter of artificial wombs being harnessed to mass-produce humans for nefarious endeavors such as slavery, trafficking, or more becomes unnervingly tangible (Cavaliere, 2017).
The Risk of Emotional Detachment and Devaluing of Human Life
The detachment from the organic processes of gestation and childbirth might exact a heavy emotional and psychological toll. Research by Denys de Catanzaro underscores that species like spiders, adept at prodigious reproduction without physical gestation, inherently undervalue individual offspring due to their vast numbers (De Catanzaro, 1995). Jeanne Alhusen’s extensive work elucidates the pivotal role of the profound emotional bonds sculpted during natural gestation and early childcare in fostering robust human connections and child development (Alhusen, 2008). Therein lies the peril — artificial wombs could potentially erode these vital emotional ties.
The Horror of Organ Harvesting Farms
The concept of organ farming casts a long, ominous shadow over the potential applications of artificial womb technology. Katrien Devolder delves into the nightmarish scenario wherein humans are engineered for the sole purpose of organ harvesting, catering exclusively to an affluent minority (Devolder, 2005). Such a dystopian reality, where humans are relegated to mere organ repositories, is a severe affront to our shared ethical principles, a sentiment echoed by philosopher Julian Savulescu (Savulescu, 1999).
Genetic Manipulation and Eugenics — The Threat of “Designer Babies”
The intertwining of artificial womb technology with genetic manipulation heralds a new set of grave concerns. Geneticists Mark Jobling and Turi King expound on the risks inherent in the relentless pursuit of “desirable” genetic traits, which might inadvertently impair the human gene pool, ushering in a slew of health issues (King & Jobling, 2009). Furthermore, Renzong Qiu’s exploration reveals the potential societal schisms that might emerge as the affluent gain exclusive access to genetically enhanced progeny (Qiu, 2020).
The Crisis of Genetic Uniformity: Lessons from Lab Rodents
The scandalous revelations surrounding the supply of genetically uniform lab rodents serve as a dire warning. Natasha Karp and colleagues unearthed that the limited genetic diversity of these rodents had far-reaching health repercussions, from curtailed life spans to heightened susceptibility to diseases (Karp et al., 2017). Matthew Wilkinson and his peers extrapolate these findings to humans, postulating that a reliance on a constrained genetic repository could spell disaster for humanity (Wilkinson et al., 2019).
A Desperate Plea to Humanity
Regardless of the tantalizing scientific allure, the latent ethical quagmires surrounding artificial womb technology cannot be sidestepped. Giulia Cavaliere ardently advocates for the implementation of stringent global regulations to thwart the possible exploitation of this technology (Cavaliere, 2017). As posited by Erica Haimes and Ken Taylor, inclusive and earnest ethical discourses, weaving in diverse perspectives, are pivotal to shaping policy and practices (Haimes & Taylor, 2015). At the core of all deliberations must be the upholding of the inviolable rights and dignity of each human being, as reaffirmed by the United Nations (UN General Assembly, 1948).
Conclusion
As humanity teeters on the cusp of groundbreaking scientific discoveries, our ethical compass must not waver. The myriad dangers lurking within the realm of artificial womb technology necessitate caution, introspection, and collective action. It is incumbent upon us to ensure that our pursuit of progress does not compromise the very essence of our shared human values.
References
Alhusen, J. L. (2008). A literature update on maternal-fetal attachment. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 37(3), 315–328.
Cavaliere, G. (2017). A 14-day limit for bioethics: The debate over human embryo research. BMC Medical Ethics, 18(38).
De Catanzaro, D. (1995). Reproductive status, family interactions, and suicidal ideation: Surveys of the general public and high-risk groups. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(5), 385–394.
Devolder, K. (2005). Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(6), 366–370.
Haimes, E., & Taylor, K. (2015). Rendered invisible? The absent presence of egg providers in U.K. debates on the acceptability of research and therapy for mitochondrial disease. Monash Bioethics Review, 33(1–2), 139–160.
Karp, N. A., et al. (2017). Impact of genetic background on life span and healthspan in the mice. Geroscience, 39(3), 257–267.
King, T. E., & Jobling, M. A. (2009). What’s in a name? Y chromosomes, surnames and the genetic genealogy revolution. Trends in Genetics, 25(8), 351–360.
Qiu, R. (2020). Ethical controversies in designer babies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(6), 3117–3127.
Savulescu, J. (1999). The ethics of cloning. Monash Bioethics Review, 18(1), 10–27.
Scott, R. (2020). The moral implications of artificial wombs. Journal of Medical Ethics, 46(9), 597–600.
Shaw, D. (2019). Artificial wombs and the complicated questions of legal parenthood. Hastings Center Report, 49(6), 25–27.
UN General Assembly. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. 217 (III) A.
Wilkinson, M., et al. (2019). Signatures of divergent genetic selection in mice and the ecological costs of better cognition. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 286(1907).
